Georgian NGOs will file a lawsuit against the "foreign agents" law with the Constitutional Court
Georgian NGOs against the “foreign agents” law
Today, on July 17, 121 non-governmental and media organizations in Georgia will file a lawsuit with the Constitutional Court to challenge the “foreign agents” law. Additionally, they intend to submit a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights.
“By enacting the ‘foreign agents’ law, the government creates a hostile environment where exercising various rights, including freedom of association and expression, becomes risky and dangerous.
We welcome the decision of the President of Georgia and members of parliament to refer this matter to the Constitutional Court. Article 78 of the Constitution [which this law violates] is fundamental to Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic integration.
We hope that the Constitutional Court of Georgia will expeditiously review the petition to suspend the enforcement of this law.
Once again, we reiterate that we will utilize all national and international mechanisms to halt and prevent the implementation of this law, up to its complete and final repeal,” say representatives of civil society.
Two lawsuits against the “foreign agents” law in the Constitutional Court
According to Article 78 of the Georgian Constitution [amended in 2017 under the ‘Georgian Dream’], which pertains to “the country’s integration into European and Euro-Atlantic structures,” constitutional bodies within the state’s jurisdiction must take all measures to ensure Georgia’s full integration into the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Earlier, president Salome Zourabichvili of Georgia and part of the opposition also stated their intention to challenge the “foreign agents” law in the Constitutional Court. Their lawsuits will be filed at the end of July.
This will be the first instance where the president challenges a law in the Constitutional Court.
What’s important to know about Georgia’s ‘foreign agents’ law?
- The “Law on Transparency of Foreign Influence” was initiated by the ruling party “Georgian Dream” and passed by Parliament in its third reading on May 28, 2024.
- The Parliament adopted this law despite massive protests, persistent calls from Georgia’s Western partners, and the opinion of the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe.
- After the passage of the law, the US announced the first package of sanctions against the “Georgian Dream” government. Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned of a “comprehensive review of US-Georgia cooperation.”
- The European Union also took retaliatory measures. In early July, the EU halted €30 million in aid to Georgia and warned of additional measures to come. Senior EU officials have repeatedly indicated that this law distances Georgia from the EU.
- On July 11, the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs passed the Megobari Act, which imposes sanctions on those involved in passing the “foreign agents” law.
The Georgian government’s main argument is that similar laws exist in the U.S. and several European countries, including France. According to Georgian Dream, every country has the right to protect itself from foreign influence and demand transparency from its organizations.
However, this comparison is inaccurate because:
The American law FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act), to which Georgian Dream refers, was enacted in the U.S. in 1938, before World War II, and aimed to protect the American public from Nazi propaganda. Neither then nor now did FARA apply to America’s allies and friendly countries.
In France, the law on “Foreign State Influence” includes a specific list of countries to which the law applies. This list comprises countries whose influence France considers a threat, including Russia, China, Turkey, and Iran. The French version also specifically states that this law does not apply to EU countries. The Georgian version lacks such provisions. Consequently, this law directly impacts organizations funded by the U.S. and the EU—friendly and partner countries that support democratic processes and numerous vital projects in Georgia, ranging from healthcare and infrastructure to strengthening civil society.
Furthermore, FARA stipulates that the law does not apply to media or NGOs, only to lobbying organizations. The Georgian version does not have this clarification.
Overall, the Georgian law is similar to the Russian law, which primarily affected media and the NGO sector. As a result, all non-governmental and media organizations not controlled by the Kremlin have been shut down in Russia. Hence, the Georgian law has been dubbed the “Russian law.”
It’s also important that this law contradicts EU legislation. When a similar law was adopted in Hungary, it was annulled by the European Court of Human Rights because it was directly aimed at silencing the media and oppressing NGOs.
The “Law on Transparency of Foreign Influence” in Georgia is set to come into effect by September 2024 when a special registry will be ready for “foreign agent organizations” to register. This applies to all organizations where over 20% of funding comes from foreign grants. In a small and not very wealthy country like Georgia, this includes the vast majority of non-governmental organizations.
Many Georgian NGOs and media refuse to register in the registry as they find the label of “organizations representing the interests of foreign states” offensive. “We work honestly in our country, so why should we be called ‘bearers of foreign state interests’?” they protest.
Some small organizations are already announcing their imminent closure. For instance, the NGO Fair Trees Foundation reported that its project to create a free children’s dental clinic would be suspended due to the law’s adoption.
Additionally, almost all animal protection organizations in Georgia rely on foreign grants, and thus the law’s adoption could lead to the closure of many of these organizations.
